Pipeline Safety Since San Bruno and Other Recent Incidents
02:30 PM Russell Senate Office Building 253
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine Infrastructure, Safety, and Security today announced a hearing on the state of pipeline safety since the San Bruno, California explosion and other recent pipeline incidents. The hearing will focus on the findings of the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation into the San Bruno accident and pending pipeline safety legislation.
Please note the hearing will also be webcast live via the Senate Commerce Committee website at http://commerce.senate.gov. Refresh the Commerce Committee homepage 10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time to view the webcast.
Individuals with disabilities who require an auxiliary aid or service, including closed captioning service for webcast hearings, should contact Collenne Wider at 202-224-5511 at least three business days in advance of the hearing date.
If you are having trouble viewing this hearing, please try the following steps:
- Clear your browser's cache - Guide to clearing browser cache
- Close and re-open your browser
- If the above two steps do not help, please try another browser. Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge have the highest level of compatibility with our player.
Majority Statement
-
Chairman John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationMajority Statement
Chairman John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV
WASHINGTON, D.C.—On a normal day, massive amounts of oil or natural gas flow through pipelines all across the country without any incident. The system powers our economy and is impressive in its efficiency. But when something goes wrong, the consequences are deadly. Explosions. Fires. Noxious fumes. And of course environmental damage.
This Committee has vast jurisdiction over a number of safety agencies that impact the everyday lives of Americans. This fact drives the Committee’s focus and agenda. Just this year, we held hearings and introduced legislation to strengthen safety in a wide range of industries from aviation, to motor vehicles and motor carriers, to consumer products.
Although pipeline transportation has proven to be relatively safe, recent incidents over the past year-and-a-half have made it all too clear that more needs to be done to improve pipeline safety. Gas pipeline explosions in San Bruno, California as well as Allentown and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania left more than twelve people dead and destroyed or damaged over one hundred homes. Oil pipeline ruptures in Michigan and Montana wreaked havoc on nearby environmental systems, the damages of which have not yet fully been accounted for or remediated. We can and must do more to avoid events like these in the future.
This year, the Committee has been working on legislation to strengthen pipeline safety efforts and give the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration the necessary tools it needs to improve oversight of our nation’s pipeline system.
Among other things, our bipartisan bill does the following:
- Increases the use of excess flow valves in multi-family buildings and commercial facilities to prevent unnecessary explosions;
- Requires the use of remote controlled and automatic shut-off valves to quickly stop gas from flowing through a pipeline when a rupture occurs; and
- Removes exemptions from “call before you dig” requirements to protect contractors from hitting pipelines during construction projects—one of the leading causes of pipeline accidents. It also requires operators to verify records and reestablish lines’ maximum operating pressure. It also increases public awareness efforts about pipeline locations and inspection activities.
I am pleased that just last night the Senate unanimously approved the Pipeline Transportation Safety Improvement Act of 2011 bringing us one step closer to enacting meaningful pipeline safety legislation for our nation. I want to thank Senator Lautenberg for his leadership on this issue.
This bill will improve the integrity of our pipeline transportation system and will help prevent accidents from happening in the future.
###
Testimony
-
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
United States SenatorCaliforniaTestimony
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
WASHINGTON, D.C.--I happened to be at home around the evening news time, turned on the news and saw this explosion. And I watched it. And I watched it for 10 minutes, 15 minutes, a half hour, 45 minutes, an hour, an hour and 39 minutes. What’s interesting is the explosion didn’t abate. There was a lot of discussion: Did a plane taking off from San Francisco International crash there? What happened? And no one really knew.
Well, I went to the scene on the Sunday after the explosion with the then-CEO and Chairman of PG&E, and looked at the scene and it was one of—as Senator Boxer’s chart showed—absolute devastation, with people who were shocked and shattered and couldn’t believe that this huge transmission line was running right under the streets of a residential subdivision.
We actually saw the part of the line and you could see the outside weld. One of the problems was the weld was only on one side and it went both circularly as well as longitudinally.
So there are a number of questions.
First, how did a pipeline owned and operated by a 106-year-old utility and regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission—in compliance with federal safety standards—blow up without warning?
And second, why did the fire rage so long?
The National Transportation Safety Board—and that’s an agency that continues to impress me, they’re straightforward, there’s no guile, they say it like it is, and they’re really to be commended—well, they’ve completed an investigation of the explosion. And the report concludes that the pipeline failed along a faulty and incomplete seam-weld when pressure spiked to unusually high levels.
The NTSB found this accident could have been prevented, and I think that’s what is important to us.
And the report reaches a simple conclusion: No one knew whether the pipeline under San Bruno was safe. Not the utility, not the state regulators and not the federal regulators.
The first problem was that PG&E’s records of the pipeline under San Bruno were wrong. They showed a seamless pipe when in fact the pipe had a seam. Because no seam was recorded, the strength of that seam was never inspected.
Second, because the pipe was installed before 1970—when pressure testing for new pipes was established—the pipeline had never undergone a strength test, a pressure test.
Like 61 percent of all pipelines in the United States, the pipeline had been grandfathered. Sixty-one percent of all pipelines have been grandfathered, meaning regulators and the industry assumed it was safe to continue operating the pipeline at pressures used in the past.
No safety buffer was established, as would have been established during a normal pressure test that pushes the pipe to 125 percent of the approved Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure.
In fact though, the San Bruno pipe failed when pressure spiked just above the historic operating levels, and far less than 125 percent above historic operating levels.
The third problem was that the pipeline had never undergone an inline inspection with a smart pig. A smart pig may have found both the existence of the unreported seams as well as their faults. Like many older pipelines, this pipe had too many twists and turns to be inspected and had never been upgraded to allow for such an inspection.
Fourth, the pipeline had inaccessible manual shutoff valves. First responders didn’t know how to cut off the gas and utility employees were stuck in traffic as the inferno raged, devastating a once-idyllic neighborhood.
So let me be clear: The problems that led to tragedy in San Bruno are not unique to that neighborhood or that pipeline. They are widespread throughout the United States.
Many older pipelines in urban areas have inaccurate and incomplete records, have never been pressure tested or inspected by smart pigs, and lack automatic or remote-controlled shutoff valves capable of limiting damage following a rupture.
At the NTSB’s recommendation, California law—and Governor Brown has just signed it—requires now that utilities throughout the state establish a traceable, verifiable and complete set of pipeline records. Thus far, utilities throughout the state have found incomplete records for as much as 30 percent of the system. So almost a third of the system with 38 million people in it have no records.
I really thank the committee for including in its pipeline safety bill a nationwide review, which Senator Boxer and I proposed in our bill. I think this will go a long way and I want to thank you for it.
The NTSB also found that 61 percent of all transmission pipelines in America were grandfathered from current pipeline strength tests, such as hydrostatic pressure tests, under DOT regulations. So, 61 percent is grandfathered.
I am pleased that the committee has accepted the amendment worked out with Senator Paul requiring that all pipelines that have never undergone a pressure test undergo a viable and effective strength test. These tests would verify the safety of current maximum allowable operating pressures and establish pressure safety buffers on older pipes for the very first time.
The Department of Transportation should also consider ordering untested pipelines to lower their pressures to establish a safety buffer, as the California Public Utilities Commission has chosen to do.
The bill would also require deployment of automatic shutoff valves on new and replacement pipes. I believe we should require these valves on all pipelines, as California has done now, but requiring them on new pipes is at least a step in the right direction.
Bottom line: the San Bruno tragedy may have been prevented had the seams been properly recorded and inspected, or had the pipeline strength ever been established with a pressure test.
And as you know, and I had the pleasure of talking with the new CEO this morning, Mr. Early, and there is another problem, and it is plastic pipe. There are 1,200 miles of PG&E’s plastic pipe that the company is now going to pull. I believe there have been some 11 accidents with this pipe that, as Mr. Early described to me this morning, under pressure, underground for some period of time, that pipe becomes brittle. And therefore a rot, a change in the ground can rupture it and then you have a gas leak. And so there have been I think 11 accidents in California from that pipe.
So I would just like to say to this committee, first of all, I think your first step has been at least been partially accomplished. The bill was hotlined, it has passed the Senate, I think that is very good news.
But I would really encourage you to look further. This is expensive for the companies, and I know it’s expensive for them. But, we’re earthquake country. We have 38 million people. These pipes are all underground, they’re in dense places. All throughout San Francisco, a relatively old city when it comes to cities in California.
So there are a lot of reasons to worry about this and I think there are a lot of reasons to really to continue to do extraordinary due diligence on this particular issue.
So senators, the three of you have made a major step forward. And I, for one, am very grateful, and I thank you.”
###
Witness Panel 2
-
The Honorable Cynthia L. Quarterman
AdministratorPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety AdministrationDownload Testimony (196.05 KB) -
The Honorable Deborah A.P. Hersman
ChairmanNational Transportation Safety BoardDownload Testimony (4.39 MB) -
Mr. Nick Stavropoulos
Executive Vice President, Gas OperationsPacific Gas & ElectricDownload Testimony (2.60 MB)Download Testimony (203.23 KB) -
Mr. Rick Kessler
Vice Presidentthe Pipeline Safety TrustDownload Testimony (92.57 KB) -
Mr. Donald Santa Jr.
President and CEOInterstate Natural Gas Association of AmericaDownload Testimony (345.78 KB) -
Ms. Christina Sames
Vice President, Operations and EngineeringAmerican Gas AssociationDownload Testimony (245.87 KB)